- Коваленко, В.В. (orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-5606) and Яцишин, А.В. (orcid.org/0000-0001-8011-5956) (2024) The impact of open science on the evaluation of the professional activity of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel «Перспективи та інновації науки (Серія «Педагогіка», Серія «Психологія», Серія «Медицина»)», 8 (42). pp. 308-328. ISSN 2786-4952
Text
Коваленко В.В., Яцишин А.В._Перспективи та інновації науки 8(42) 2024.pdf - Published Version Download (6MB) |
Abstract
The publication analyzes the impact of open science on the changes in methodology and tools for evaluating the professional activities of scientific and scientific-pedagogical staff. It is noted that different countries apply various criteria and indicators for evaluating scientific research and individual scientists. Predominantly, these indicators are related to the number of citations of scientific publications; however, these indicators are not an ideal means of determining the influence of scientific research as they have several limitations. It has been established that the implementation of open science has a significant impact on the evaluation of the professional activities of scientific and scientific-pedagogical staff, specifically through the following factors: transparency and openness of scientific results; improvement of peer review quality; enhancement of evaluation forms and tools; and changes in the methodology of conducting scientific research. For Ukraine, it is important not only to implement open science but also to modernize the system of evaluating scientific activities. To achieve this, it is necessary to take into account the best domestic and foreign experiences and the recommendations (both at the national and institutional levels) developed by a team of renowned experts in 2023-2024. It is also worth actively applying the experiences and recommendations of international and domestic organizations, associations, and projects (cOAlition S, OpenAIRE, COST, OPTIMA, Open4UA), whose activities are directly related to the promotion of open science principles and the standardization of criteria and indicators for evaluating the activities of scientists, research teams, universities, and research institutes. The criteria and indicators for evaluating the professional activities of scientific and scientific-pedagogical staff and the open science tools that can be used to verify their accuracy are described and systematized. It has been determined that the implementation of open science has a significant positive impact on the evaluation of the professional activities of scientific and scientific-pedagogical staff and the change in the very methodology of conducting scientific activities.
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |