- Боголєпова, Аліна Віталіївна (orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-2518) (2025) State organisational and legal mechanism for corruption prevention in Ukraine Masters thesis, Державний заклад вищої освіти "Університет менеджменту освіти".
![[thumbnail of Дисертація Боголєпова А.В.]](https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (Дисертація Боголєпова А.В.)
BOHOLIEPOVA_manuscript_13_06_25_підпис (1).pdf - Published Version Download (8MB) |
|
Text (КЕП_дисертації Боголєпова АВ)
BOHOLIEPOVA_manuscript_13_06_25_підпис (1).verified_Validation_Report.pdf - Published Version Download (52kB) |
|
Text (ключ КЕП_Боголєпова АВ дисертація)
BOHOLIEPOVA_manuscript_13_06_25_підпис (1).verified.pdf - Published Version Download (8MB) |
|
Text (Відгук опонента І.О.Драган_Боголєпова А.В.)
ВІДГУК_опонент_Драган.orig.pdf - Published Version Download (402kB) |
|
Text (Відгук опонента І.О.Драган_Бголєпова А.В.з підписом)
ВІДГУК_опонент_Драган.pdf - Published Version Download (437kB) |
|
Text (протокол підпису відгук опонента І.О.Драган_Боголєпова А.В.)
ВІДГУК_опонент_Драган_Validation_Report.pdf Download (50kB) |
|
Text (Відгук опонента В.Г.Горник_дисертація Боголєпова А.В.)
Відгук Горник В.Г..pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) |
|
Text (ключ підпису В.Г.Горник_дисертація Боголєпова А.В.)
Відгук Горник В.Г..pdf.p7s - Published Version Download (3MB) |
|
Text (протокол підпису відгук опонента В.Г Горник_дис.Боголєпова А.В.)
Відгук Горник В.Г._Validation_Report.pdf - Published Version Download (51kB) |
|
Text (Відгук опонента Я.Ф.Жовнірчик_дисертація Боголєпова А.В.)
Відгук опонента Жовнірчик Я.Ф. (підписаний) (2).pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) |
|
Text (протокол підпису відгук опонента Я.Ф.Жовнірчик_дис.Боголєпова А.В.)
Відгук опонента Жовнірчик Я.Ф. (підписаний)_Validation_Report.pdf - Published Version Download (51kB) |
|
Text (Рецензія В.В.Мороз_дис.Боголєпова А.В.)
Рецензія_Мороз_Боголєпова.orig.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) |
|
Text (рецензія підписана_В.В.Мороз_дис.Боголєпова А.В.)
Рецензія_Мороз_Боголєпова.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) |
|
Text (протокол підпису рецензія В.В.Мороз-дис.Боголєпова А.В.)
Рецензія_Мороз_Боголєпова_Validation_Report.pdf - Published Version Download (50kB) |
Abstract
Boholiepova A. V. State organisational and legal mechanism for corruption prevention in Ukraine. – On the rights of manuscript. Dissertation to achieve the scientific level of Doctor of Philosophy for a specialty 281 – Public management and administration. – State institution of higher education “University of Education Management”, Kyiv, 2025. Annotation content The dissertation addresses a pressing scientific problem by obtaining novel, scientifically substantiated results in the field of knowledge 28 “Public Management and Administration”. These findings aim to enhance the state's organizational and legal mechanism for corruption prevention in Ukraine, drawing upon cutting-edge theoretical and methodological approaches, European standards, and global trends in the anti-corruption sphere. The ultimate goal is to improve the effectiveness of policies, procedures, and public administration decisions in the realm of corruption prevention. The scientific novelty of the obtained results lies in deriving new, scientifically substantiated findings that address a specific scientific problem: the improvement of the state's organizational and legal mechanism for corruption prevention in Ukraine. This is achieved by building upon cutting-edge theoretical and methodological approaches, European standards, and global trends in the anti corruption domain. The most significant scientific results of the dissertation are as follows: for the first time: - a conceptual model of state anti-corruption control has been developed as a fundamental component of the state's organizational and legal mechanism. This model is built upon an institutional approach and envisions a comprehensive set of state actions in priority areas concerning the organization of prevention, detection, and counteraction against corruption offenses and other illicit acts. It also encompasses the evaluation of the corruption prevention system's effectiveness and the analysis of management decisions aimed at neutralizing corruption risks, all to form an objective judgment about the state of anti-corruption policy's effectiveness. This model aims to enhance the efficacy of state actions in cooperation with civil society organizations, utilizing a combination of proposed principles, methods, and tools; has been improved: - systematization of elements for the conceptualization of state anti corruption policy to ensure a higher level of its effectiveness. This is achieved through criteria that differ from existing ones by incorporating actors at all levels, and the specifics of their influence and functioning. These criteria include: actor type (state, municipal, departmental, corporate, independent (public, civil society), joint); indirectness of influence (direct, indirect, mixed); main function of policy institutions (coordinative or distributive); access to information (transparent, restricted, backroom); scale (systemic, elementary); presence of an institutional environment (discretionary, non-discretionary); and institutional component (improvement of rules, strengthening of enforcement mechanisms); - grouping of factors influencing the spread of corruption, which, unlike other approaches, is based on a determinant approach. Specifically, the following groups of determinant factors are proposed: level of decentralization of power; existing experience in corruption prevention; political stability; salary level of public servants; fragmentation of rule of law enforcement; level of corruption in specific sectors and the public sector; degree of public administration effectiveness and competence of public servants; existence of mechanisms for preventing potential conflicts of interest; degree of public administration bureaucratization; and socio cultural characteristics that allow for the identification of historical, social, cultural, and other causes of corruption's emergence and proliferation; - institutional component of the state organizational and legal mechanism for implementing the anti-corruption control function. This, unlike the existing structure, will include a newly established specialized institution: the National Inspectorate for Integrated Anti-Corruption Control, designated as a central executive body. This body will perform control, coordination, analytical, and methodological functions in the field of corruption prevention. This innovation will enable the overcoming of overlapping powers among existing specialized anti corruption institutions, reduce inter-agency competition, enhance the effectiveness of preventive measures, and ensure the integrity of the state-level anti-corruption control system; further development has taken place: - Conceptual and terminological framework for developing state policy and the organizational and legal mechanism for corruption prevention, specifically: “State organizational and legal mechanism for corruption prevention” which, unlike existing ones, is based on systemic, structural, and process approaches. This allows for its interpretation as a complex of interconnected organizational structures (entities), normative legal acts, procedures, instruments, and methods that, in synergy, ensure the effective implementation of state policy in the field of corruption prevention, with the state, through its public authorities, acting as the object of management. “Corruption” from an integrated approach, is interpreted as a complex socio-economic phenomenon where public officials intentionally obtain benefits for themselves and third parties, abusing their powers to receive additional remuneration in material or any other form, to the detriment of state and societal interests. “Corruption prevention” drawing on systemic and competency-based approaches, is defined as a purposeful, systemically organized activity of authorized entities. This activity is grounded in professional competencies, ethical standards, and legal norms, and is aimed at identifying, minimizing, and eliminating the causes, conditions, and opportunities for the emergence of corrupt practices in both the public and private sectors; - knowledge about facts that reveal the latest global trends in the formation and effective functioning of the state organizational and legal mechanism for corruption prevention. These, unlike previously known facts (openness, transparency, accountability, rule of law, etc.), pertain to corruption prevention mechanisms. Specifically, this includes an institutional mechanism with the possibility of creating a new specialized anti-corruption institution with an anti corruption control function; an organizational and legal mechanism for public service recruitment; motivational mechanisms for preventing corrupt practices in public service and developing integrity; a digitalization mechanism that will facilitate the improvement of the e-governance system, ensure the accessibility and inclusivity of electronic public services, and enable monitoring of the effectiveness and efficiency of corruption prevention tools; an educational mechanism for fostering zero tolerance for corruption in society; and a control state mechanism for corruption prevention.
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |