- Спірін, О.М. (orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-6602), Олексюк, Василь Петрович (orcid.org/0000-0003-2206-8447), Іванова, С.М. (orcid.org/0000-0002-3613-9202) and Новицька, Т.Л. (orcid.org/0000-0003-2591-5218) (2023) Criteria and indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of collective pedagogical research Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, 6 (98). pp. 190-211. ISSN 2076-8184
Text
5471.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) |
Abstract
The article studies the problem of evaluating the results of scientific and pedagogical research. The study outlines the various advantages of using the altmetric approach, such as obtaining various indicators to assess the impact of research, overcoming disciplinary differences, and attracting a wider readership. The article analyzes altmetric indicators of the effectiveness of scientific research, in particular, based on views, citations, bookmarking and discussion. Analyzing the existing models for assessing research effectiveness, the authors conclude that they need to be improved and adapted to the case of pedagogical research conducted by teams of scientists. Accordingly, the authors’ model of using information and digital technologies to evaluate the effectiveness of collective pedagogical research includes target, content, organizational, activity and evaluation and result blocks. It is indicated that the evaluation of the effectiveness of collective pedagogical research is an additive value formed as the sum of the evaluation of publication, dissemination, impact and expert evaluation. The indicators of the publication criterion are the number of publications in international scientometric and open bibliometric databases, in scientific electronic libraries, academic and public social networks. Dissemination indicators include the number of downloads, archiving, and follow-up of research conducted within the collective theme. Impact indicators include citations of publications in the above publications, dissemination of research results, comments, reactions, and citations in public social networks, views, comments, and citations in academic social networks. The indicators of the expert criterion include the novelty and validity of the results obtained, the appropriateness and validity of the research methods used, its long-term impact on the field of education, the possibility of implementing the results in practice, attracting additional sources of funding, and the quality of publications of the research leader and research performers. The article provides examples of the use of scientometric services and digital tools to assess the effectiveness of the given criteria.
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |