- Рева, Олексій Миколайович (orcid.org/0000-0002-5954-290X), Камишин, Володимир Вікторович (orcid.org/0000-0002-8832-9470), Радецька, Світлана Валеріївна (orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-8179) and Липчанський, Володимир Олександрович (orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-0518) (2020) Cybernetic Approach to Fuzzy Measurement Recognition of Academic Gifted Levels as an Indicator of Educational Process Management Education and Development of Gifted Personality, 2 (77). pp. 35-46. ISSN 2309‑3935
Text
6.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Based on the fact that the management of an educational process is the essence of a continuous chain of decisions, it is justified that it should take place based on such modern qualimetric indicators of these decisions as academic talent fuzzy assessments, basic educational decision-making dominants, claims levels and benefits of the process participants. The special fuzzy models’ role of academic giftedness levels of qualimetry which are built based on the methodology of fuzzy mathematics, for linguistic variables’ term sets of corresponding quality scales (4-point, European "facilitated" ECTS, 12-point) assessment of academic giftedness levels according to the measuring properties of the absolute 100-point scale. The models provide both a reasonable quantitative and qualitative correspondence of estimates within one scale, and a reasonable transition from one scale to another. The corresponding conclusion is made based on the value of the membership function. It was found that the most disparate are the scores of 12-point scale, which have the lowest fuzzy entropy of 0,77, the least disparate – the scores of the European ECTS scale: fuzzy entropy is 0,86, scores of 4-point scale are intermediate as the distinction, which is equal to 0,81. The worst grade X and the best grade A of the European "light" ECTS scale have the same differences, while for a 4-point scale this difference is 27,5%, and for a 12-point scale – 85,7%. A comparison of the difference degree between the scores on the 4-point and 12-point scales, based on the level of academic talent, shows that the grades for low and medium level are better, respectively, by 3,4% and 3,6% for the first of them. At the same time, the estimates of the 12-point scale are much more diverse, covering a sufficient and high level of academic talent – by 13,3% and 11,6%, respectively.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | quantitative and qualitative indicators of academic talent levels; recognition measure; fuzzy entropy |
Subjects: | Science and knowledge. Organization. Computer science. Information. Documentation. Librarianship. Institutions. Publications > 3 Social Sciences > 303 Methods of the social sciences |
Divisions: | Institute of the gifted child > Giftedness Development Projection Department |
Depositing User: | н.с. Олена Василівна Онопченко |
Date Deposited: | 24 Dec 2020 20:54 |
Last Modified: | 24 Dec 2020 20:54 |
URI: | https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/722659 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |